A Comprehensive Comparison of Manual Testing vs. Automation Testing - CodeQAByte

A Comprehensive Comparison of Manual Testing vs. Automation Testing

Share This

 

AspectManual TestingAutomation Testing
Execution ProcessTesters execute test cases manually without automation tools.Automated test scripts are created and executed by testing tools.
Exploratory TestingInvolves exploratory testing, relying on testers' intuition.Limited role in exploratory testing; mainly follows predefined scripts.
Speed and EfficiencyTime-consuming, especially for repetitive tasks.Faster and more efficient, suitable for repeated execution.
Adaptability to ChangesHighly adaptable to changes; test cases can be easily modified.Less adaptable in the early stages due to script maintenance efforts.
RepeatabilityResults may vary based on manual execution.Highly repeatable, providing consistent results in each run.
Scripting RequirementNo scripting required; test cases are manually executed.Requires scripting skills; test scripts are created using programming languages.
Initial InvestmentMinimal initial investment in tools and infrastructure.Requires an initial investment in tools, training, and infrastructure.
Suitability forBest suited for exploratory testing, small projects, or initial stages.Ideal for repetitive tasks, regression testing, and large-scale projects.
Human InterventionDirect human intervention is required for test execution.Limited human intervention during test execution.
FlexibilityProvides flexibility, allowing testers to adapt to changes easily.Less flexible in handling changes due to script maintenance efforts.
Learning CurveGenerally easier for beginners to learn and perform.May have a steeper learning curve, especially for non-programmers.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Copyright © 2024 codeqabyte. All Right Reserved